Last year, while tutoring Challenge A, one of the greatest tools I learned was Andrew Kern's highlighting system. It is a color coded process for marking books. Recently, Sarah Mackenzie hosted a webinar where Andrew taught her about the system. It is worth a watch.
For those of you who are skeptics about marking in books, consider this quote from Mortimer Adler's "How to Mark a Book":
The soul of a book "can" be separate from its body. A book is more like the score of a piece of music than it is like a painting. No great musician confuses a symphony with the printed sheets of music. Arturo Toscanini reveres Brahms, but Toscanini's score of the G minor Symphony is so thoroughly marked up that no one but the maestro himself can read it. The reason why a great conductor makes notations on his musical scores -- marks them up again and again each time he returns to study them--is the reason why you should mark your books. If your respect for magnificent binding or typography gets in the way, buy yourself a cheap edition and pay your respects to the author.
At a young age my father taught me the benefits to marking in my Bible. Transferring this skill to the books I read, I would make pencil notations in the margins. However when I came across a difficult book, I found that I didn't know what was important to mark, or even how to go about gaining understanding of the text. While I haven't implemented the system just like Andrew, the beauty is that it has changed how I read, because my mind is constantly searching for answers to some really simple questions.
First, I look for names, dates, key terms, and I underline in pink. (I've decided that highlighters are too intense for me, and I like how the underlines turn out). What I'm really thinking about are questions like:
- Who is this chapter about?
- When did the events happen?
- Are there any important words?
After I've read the chapter, I sum up the chapter, or give it a title.
Next, I look for questions or lists. Some also include scene changes for their green markings, but I haven't mastered that element yet, so I stick with what I know. While I read I find my self thinking:
- Why did they ask that question?
- Was there an answer to the question?
- (In the Bronze Bow specifically) Why does Jesus often speak in question form?
- Is there a list to pay attention to?
- Why did they include some items in a list and not others?
I also take time to note any of the Five Common Topics of Invention that come to mind as I read. These notes serve to propel conversation when I get together with anyone to discuss the book.
Lastly, I pay attention to what I enjoy - or what I feel is important to the character or plot. This is my favorite part, and I might be too blue happy in some books. If that happens, I add yellow to differentiate between the best of the best. After I've read the book, the blues would be the quotes I want to copy down in my commonplace book, or bring to class to share as we discuss. The questions that arise with blues are:
- Is this important to the development of a character?
- Does this idea mirror a Biblical truth?
- Does this inspire me to change the way I act or think?
I usually find my books used, so I don't mind marking them up as much. I also make sure that my son has his own copy to mark up. It might seem wasteful, but Renee Mathis' post On Wrecking Books to Bring Them To Life was very convincing on the cost of cultivating a love of thinking readers.
It is definitely a slower way to read a book, but fast isn't always better. In the end, after highlighting this way, I feel I have a greater grasp of the content, and I am more eager to get together and discuss because I actually have something to say!